Triadformula.com says Forex trading is better than any other types of investments - PRLog (free press release)
Financial Experts say Forex trading is considered as the best form of financial commitment. Here are some of the reasons that make it better than trading and other types of investments. Compared to shares and futures trading industry, Forex trading includes restricted risk. The industry is less unpredictable and if the forex currency trading is managed properly, there can be no or lowest drops. This is because forex currency trading is not determined by just one company or person. It is determined by the overall economic health of the country.
Triadformula.com says “In the forex currency trading, you cannot lose more money than you actually have in your trading consideration. You get an edge call if the amount required by your consideration surpasses the limit required by your consideration.”
Talking about triad trading formula expert say “Trading is straightforward “. Adding to this expert say “Though there is a multitude of different foreign exchange, you need to focus only on four major currency sets. In inventory industry marketplaces, there are over a large number of shares to business on. For a newbie, trading can be frustrating and time-consuming. But, forex currency trading needs less research and is very fast to get started with.”
Forex trading committing occurs very immediately and at almost whenever of the day or night. The industry is open 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. You can business almost at any time and from anywhere you want. With online forex currency trading systems, creating financial commitment in forex has become all the more fast and practical.
In forex currency trading, there are no middle men or providers. You can carry the trading on your own. In trading, you have to go through a broker which not only decelerates the advance, but also costs you much. In forex currency trading committing, you are free to take away all the income that you earn by creating financial commitment in forex.
One the forex trading gurus, Jason Fielder, has just released “triad trading formula 2.0." This publication will be a valuable resource for those who want to get into forex trading and need to know exactly where to start. It gives detailed information on how the market operates, gives examples and scenarios, and defines terms and jargon. This will be a good foundation for the new investors to be able to participate in foreign currency trading.
The recent news which highlighted these days is “Triad Trading Formula from Jason Fielder is in pre-launch to re-open once again to the public. “
Triad Trading Formula Review
Jason Fielder provides three exclusive videos for those who are knew to forex trading and who want to better understand the "60:30:10" principle. These videos show the principle in action and also demonstrate some real-life trading scenarios. Jason Fielder's "Triad Trading Report" can be obtained free of charge for a short period of time.
For details visit: - http://www.forextradingcoursereviews.com/
Sopranos star 'was friend of real-life mobster who tried to extort money from Joe Pesci's cousin' - Daily Mail
By Lyle Brennan and James Nye
|
A star of hit TV series The Sopranos made a dramatic appearance in the trial of a real-life mob boss today - as a court saw a gangster accused of trying to recover a loan for the actor.
Federico Castelucci, who played a feared hitman in the hit HBO series, allegedly lent $50,000 to a restauranteur - Joe Pesci's cousin - and struggled to get the money back.
A recording played in a New York courtroom today appears to shows Mafia boss Andrew 'Mush' Russo ordering one of his lieutenants to 'recover' the money.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Liz Geddes for the prosecution says Russo can be heard talking about how his friend, Castelluccio had invested thousands in Gino Pesci's New Jersey Italian bistro, and orders one of his 'captains' to demand the money back from Mr Pesci.
Courtroom drama: Federico Castelluccio, left, played Furio Giunta on The Sopranos and allegedly loaned $50,000 to Gino Pesci to open a restaurant in New Brunswick. Mob boss Andrew 'Mush' Russo is accused of ordering one of his associates to demands the money back
The New York Post reports Russo says: 'Joe Pesci’s cousin. He [cheated] some kid... took $70,000. When they went, when they went to grab him, [he said] "I blew it, I don’t have it'.
'This kid, you know the kid, Federico Castelluccio?... The kid who played Furio on the Sopranos.'
The mafioso does not appear to give his man specific instructions on how he should get the money back, but federal agents believe it would be through means of extortion.
'I'll get you all the information,' Russo is heard to promise.
However, court papers show Russo's lawyer, George Galgano insisted the conversation was merely an innocent discussion between film fans.
He contends that his client had been talking about the role played by Joe Pesci - his alleged target's famous cousin - in the hit children's Christmas movie Home Alone, starring Macaulay Culkin and directed by John Hughes.
Arguing in court papers that Russo never intended to extort any money from Gino Pesci, Mr Galgano wrote, 'This never happened'.
Sticking to their claim the Russo was only discussing Joe Pesci's role in 'Home Alone', Mr Galgano wrote that Russo also mentioned a script that Gino Pesci is supposed to have borrowed money for.
Edie Falco (left) and Federico Castelluccio (right) appearing as Carmel Soprano and Furio Giunta respectively on the hit HBO show
Countering the prosecutions version of events, Mr Gargano seems to suggest in the court documents that Russo had been misinformed, and that there was no script, no dispute and no money owed to Mr Castelluccio.
Regardless of Russo's claims it was enough for Judge Kiyo Matsumoto to reject a bail request by Russo, who is due to go on trial for racketeering, saying: 'The evidence in this case is strong.'
The origin of the case against Colombo street boss Russo stems from Castelluccio investing $50,000 in 2002 in Gino Pesci's Attilio Pasta Kitchen, based in New Brunswick.
Folding two years later, Gino Pesci acknowledged that his relationship with Castelluccio fell apart.
Andrew 'Mush' Russo's defence claimed that he was talking about Joe Pesci (pictured right) and his appearance in the hit 1990 film 'Home Alone' which Joe Pesci starred in
'Federico is an incredible artist, but he’s not a businessman. Maybe that’s why he took it harder than the rest,' said Pesci to the New York Post.
However, a bone of contention opened up between the two when Pesci went on a spending spree after the closure, while Castelluccio felt that his investment should have been returned claims the New York Post.
It is known that Castelluccio and Russo are friends and in 2011 the actor showed up at Russo's bail hearing in Brooklyn.
Ray Liotta (left), Robert de Niro (second left), Paul Sorvino and Joe Pesci (right) starred in the 1990 film 'Goodfellas' about organised crime in the 1960's and 1970's
At the time of a an October 2011 article in the New York Post investigating his friendship with Russo, Castelluccio issued a statement.
'Gino Pesci has never owed me any money, and therefore, it is hard to imagine why anyone would even think about asking him for anything on my behalf.
'It never happened. And anyone who claims that it did happen is simply not telling the truth.'
Both the Sopranos star and Gino Pesci deny any knowledge of an extortion plot.
As well as the charge relating to Mr Pesci, Russo is accused of extorting medical expenses from the rival Gambino crime family, after one of their number allegedly stabbed a Colombo family mobster.
Video doesn’t prove that Hargrove said “give me my money” - NBC Sports
APMaybe it really wasn’t Anthony Hargrove’s voice saying, “Give me my money.”
The video/audio of a comment supposedly made by the former Saints defensive end during the third quarter of the 2009 NFC title game provides further proof of Drew Brees‘ point (even if it wasn’t articulated the best way possible) that the media has more power than anyone realizes.
The NFL, however, fully realizes.
And the NFL used the power of the media to make millions believe on Monday that Saints defensive Anthony Hargrove said, ‘Bobby, give me my money’ after being told by assistant head coach Joe Vitt that Vikings quarterback Brett Favre may have suffered a broken leg in the 2009 NFC title game.
The seed was planted and fertilized when a dozen members of the media covering Monday’s appeal hearing received an invitation to witness an encore performance of former prosecutor Mary Jo White’s summary of evidence. The relevant excerpt from the transcript of the media session contains White’s explanation, comments from NFL Security chief Jeff Miller, comments from NFL spokesman Greg Aiello, and two of the members of the media — Peter King and Jim Varney.
White initially explained that the video contains Hargrove’s “voice and picture.” After the video was shown once to the members of the media, Aiello suggested that the media pay attention to Hargrove winking and smiling after hearing that Favre broke his leg. White later claims that Hargrove “smiles and winks and states, ‘Bobby, pay me my money.’”
Varney asks White, “How do you know it’s Hargrove’s voice?”
White, perhaps not recognizing in that moment the ironic link to a very common lawyer joke, says, “Because you can see his lips moving.”
But here’s the problem, and I didn’t notice this the first time I saw the video.
When Hargrove’s lips can be seen moving, his voice can’t be heard.
Only after Hargrove’s face is fully obscured by the head and shoulders of defensive tackle Remi Ayodele are the words “give me my money” audible.
No one has questioned this because the media present at the session was told — and in turn told the rest of us — that Hargrove said, “Bobby, give me my money.” Even Peter King, who seemed curious and a bit skeptical in the transcript, affirmatively stated twice in his article following the media session that Hargrove said what the NFL claims he said.
Watch the video. At most, Hargrove is the one who says “Bobby.” By the time “give me my money” comes out, Hargrove’s mouth and face and head are obscured by Ayodele.
Also, don’t forget that Hargrove didn’t apply the hit that resulted in Favre possibly having a broken leg. Instead, Favre had been hit low by McCray and high by Ayodele. So why would Hargrove be asking for any money at all?
None of this changes the fact that, barring evidence that the phrase was added artificially after the fact (I’m not saying it was . . . yet), someone said “give me my money.” Which supports the conclusion that there was a bounty on Favre.
But I don’t believe the video shown by the league to the media shows that Hargrove said it. And I can’t believe that the NFL presumes conclusively that he said it. And I can’t believe the NFL sold it as fact to the media. And I can’t believe the media swallowed the hook.
And I can’t believe I didn’t pay close enough attention to figure it out before today.
And given Hargrove’s passionate denial that it’s his voice, I believe him.
This serious flaw in the presentation of the evidence necessarily undermines the league’s entire investigation, further reinforcing the importance of asking tough questions about the proof, the process, and all other aspects of the case. Regardless of whether the players are guilty or innocent, the NFL has peddled to the public, via the media, a stream of inconsistencies, mischaracterizations, and embellishments that raise legitimate concerns about the competence and/or the motives of everyone whose fingerprints are on the file.
UPDATE 8:44 p.m. ET: A prior version of this item explained that, when Hargrove’s lips are moving, his words aren’t audible. I’ve studied the video several more times, and it now appears to me that Hargrove is the one who says, “Bobby.” However, by the time “give me my money” is uttered, Hargrove’s face and head and mouth are obscured. Thus, the video doesn’t prove who said it. It could have been Hargrove. It could have been Ayodele. (It would make more sense if the league were claiming it was Ayodele, since he hit Favre high when “Bobby” hit Favre low.) It also could have been someone outside of view of the camera, talking about something completely unrelated to Favre’s apparently injury.
Strangled by tight money - Chicago Tribune
Remember the guy who ran for governor of New York as the candidate of the Rent Is Too Damn High Party? We need a new one, called the Money Is Too Damn Tight Party. It would get my vote.
But the vote it needs belongs to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, and he isn't giving it. On Wednesday, the Fed indicated it would stick to its current course, declining to embark on another "quantitative easing" that would inject a lot more money into the economy.
He and many other people have awful memories of high inflation from the late 1970s and early 1980s. No one wants to repeat that experience. But inflation-phobes resemble someone stranded in the desert without water who spends his time frantically searching for a life preserver.
- Bio | E-mail | Blog | Recent columns
Plenty of people, including several Republicans who ran for president, think money is too loose. But what would the world look like if the opposite were true?
Commodity prices would fall. Unemployment would be painfully high. People would be reluctant to buy houses for fear they would lose value. Economic growth would stall.
Sound familiar? Those signs are a tipoff to our real economic problem: too few dollars in circulation.
The U.S. economy is not experiencing actual deflation. But a person who has a cold doesn't take great comfort in not having pneumonia. Right now, the economy is showing signs of a malady that looks like deflation's close relative.
Inflation occurs when there is too much money chasing too few goods. Deflation occurs when there is not enough money. For years, inflation alarmists have been forecasting runaway prices as a result of the Fed's efforts to expand the money supply. But prices have remained stable, with the Consumer Price Index down last month and up just 1.7 percent in the past year.
Don't believe the official numbers? The Billion Prices Project at MIT says lately, inflation is actually lower than the government estimates.
By now, it should be obvious that the problem is not that the Fed has injected too much money into the economy but too little. The price of gold — which jumps at the slightest whiff of inflation — has plunged from more than $1,900 an ounce last year to less than $1,630.
The commodity price index is down 7 percent from a year ago. Home sales have been tepid despite mortgage rates lower than anyone could ever have dreamed.
When lenders anticipate debasement of the currency, they demand higher interest rates to compensate for the risk. But currently, five-year Treasury bills are paying 0.71 percent, and 20-year bonds offer only 2.33 percent. In the mid-90s, a period of low inflation, those rates ranged well north of 5 percent.
Inflation hawks have been predicting a severe outbreak for years. But David Henderson, an economist at Stanford University's Hoover Institution and the Naval Postgraduate School, has been skeptical enough to put his money where his mouth is.
In December 2009, he publicly bet economist Robert Murphy of the Pacific Research Institute $500 that by January 2013, there would not be a single point at which the CPI would be up 10 percent or more from a year before. So far, it hasn't been, and it shows no sign it will.
Another economist who thinks inflation is the least of our worries is Scott Sumner of Bentley University in Massachusetts. He says the increase in the money supply has not unleashed inflation because the demand for dollars has risen as well.
When banks or individuals hold on to cash, he notes, the effect is the same as if the Fed were shrinking the money supply. By refusing to spend or invest, they stifle economic activity.
That effect is apparent in the slowing of the economy, which was not exactly galloping to start with. Job growth is on a glacial pace. Three years after the recession officially ended, we have 5 million fewer jobs than we had before it began.
The Fed's past quantitative easing programs have helped, but they haven't been big enough or lasted long enough. Sumner argues that the central bank should commit to sticking with the tactic as long as it takes to get growth back to a healthy pace — backing off only if there are signs that inflation is likely to rise significantly.
Could inflation make a comeback? Sure. So could the Soviet Union. But until it does, we should deal with dangers that are not imaginary.
Steve Chapman is a member of the Tribune's editorial board and blogs at chicagotribune.com/chapman.
Twitter @SteveChapman13
FOREX-Dollar edges higher after Fed announcement - Reuters UK
Thomson Reuters is the world's largest international multimedia news agency, providing investing news, world news, business news, technology news, headline news, small business news, news alerts, personal finance, stock market, and mutual funds information available on Reuters.com, video, mobile, and interactive television platforms. Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.
NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. Nasdaq delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.
Pip Jet Review For Forex EA Robot By The Forex Megadroid Creators Revealed - YAHOO!
Pip Jet review is released for the new Forex EA robot that was created by the makers of Forex Megadroid. Does Pip Jet work or is it a scam is revealed at ForexVestor.com.
Houston, TX (PRWEB) June 20, 2012
Pip Jet reviews have been flooding in as the Forex Megadroid creators get ready to release their first product in three years. Many traders are anticipating the release due to the fact that Forex Megadroid was so successful and it changed the Forex trading landscape forever. With over 44,000 subscribers it's been one of the most successful Forex robots.A Pip Jet review of the robot shows it has been in development since 2010 and the team has been perfecting it to ensure that it can match and surpass the success of the Forex Megadroid robot. In February of 2010 the creators noticed a pattern in the USD/CAD, created the robot and began testing. They have 5 live accounts that have been trading to prove that the system works.
Pip Jet results that have come from one account have been remarkable. The creators say they have one account from August 2010 that started with $1,000 and now is close to $40,000. They also stated they have had very low draw down and few loses.
With upgraded client support and educational infrastructure as well as a solid product with ongoing upgrades, the creators believe this will be program will outsell Forex Megadroid.
A reviewer from http://ForexVestor.com states, "Although we have not personally tested the Forex EA we are excited to promote Pip Jet EA robot. We normally do not endorse Forex robots but after talking with the creators and seeing the success of Forex Megadroid, we decided to write a review and promote the product. A complete PipJet review will be released on our site when the program is released to the public."
For those who want more information about the program can visit the official website here.
For those who want to read the complete review should visit: http://forexvestor.com/pipjet-review-ea-robot-scam
Mike Staples
HealthAvenger.com
832-690-6969
Email Information
Forex Flash: After FOMC over, EUR/USD to resume downtrend - Standard Chartered - FXStreet.com
FOREX-Dollar slips versus euro in choppy trade after Fed - Reuters UK
Thomson Reuters is the world's largest international multimedia news agency, providing investing news, world news, business news, technology news, headline news, small business news, news alerts, personal finance, stock market, and mutual funds information available on Reuters.com, video, mobile, and interactive television platforms. Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.
NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. Nasdaq delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.
A valuable lesson in pocket money - The Independent
No wonder experts say parents should introduce their children to basic financial matters at an earlier age than ever. "Teaching children the value of money from an early age provides a good foundation for their future spending habits, and sends positive messages about managing finances and living within one's means," explains Simon Walsh, spokesman for Family Lives. "Their observations of how you spend, save, budget and donate to charities can shape early views about money management."
Get them involved in making their own financial decisions too. "My eight-year-old son Henry knows that if he wants something, he must select a few items he no longer wants, photograph them, write a description and put them on eBay," says Rebecca Gunn, 39, who lives in Bedfordshire.
Like many parents, Gunn also uses pocket money to help her son to understand its value. "It stops him walking into a shop wanting everything he sees. It makes him think about what he wants and he enjoys weighing up the pros and cons of things as the week goes on."
Research from Equifax reveals a growing emphasis on encouraging children to "earn" their pocket money through basic chores such as washing up and tidying up. The average amount children receive, according to another survey by Halifax, is £4.57 for 8-11 year-olds and £7.02 for 12-15 year olds. "Each of my two children, aged five and seven, has a special job around the house once a week," says Sarah Brown, a 40-year-old mother from Kent. "It means they realise they need to contribute something to earn money."
A vital component of the pocket money concept, she believes, is that kids discover their own spending power. "This is where, as a parent, you have to get the balance right between parental advice and allowing your child to make their own decisions – and therefore mistakes. It's definitely given my children an understanding, which did not exist a year ago, of how important it is to know how much things cost," says Brown. "Even simple things like checking the price tag on the box to see if it's affordable, is not something you see many kids do. Perhaps most satisfying of all is that my eldest, has opened a bank account and is already beginning to grasp the concept of interest."
When your children hit their teens, consider swapping pocket money for a monthly allowance, but the same principles apply, advises Pritee Chohan, Money for Life Programme volunteer and a branch manager for Halifax. "Sit them down to explain the differences between the savings accounts on offer and help them to budget for that holiday with friends or for driving lessons. By the time they leave home, they should have all the money savvy they need to make a great start in life."
No comments:
Post a Comment